change 2 (to squash)
This commit is contained in:
parent
06539e332d
commit
08d9cb1b77
|
@ -12,3 +12,12 @@ Preambulatory clauses provide background on why your resolution is needed, the p
|
||||||
Operative clauses are the items of action; they are directives that countries agree to.
|
Operative clauses are the items of action; they are directives that countries agree to.
|
||||||
(Only the Security Council has the power of passing *mandatory* directives.)
|
(Only the Security Council has the power of passing *mandatory* directives.)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
As an example, let's assume we're writing a resolution that condemns kicking puppies. (I would hope that you'd agree with the premise; if not -- that's an interesting opinion.) There was a recent puppy kicking event in the country of `Madeupia`, so let's note that:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> Noting with concern the International Puppy Kicking Event held in `Madeupia` on 22 September 2024, where various kinds of dogs were subject to unconsionable acts of depravity and abuse,
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This is a good example of a preambulatory clause -- it states background for the operative clauses. If someone asked you if people actually kick dogs, this is your response. It demonstrates the necessity of the resolution.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
There also might be past resulutions about animal abuse or dogs, so it might be prudent to mention those, too:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> Affirming resolution UNEP/5/1, which
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue